Cuts to tax credits and benefits will push 200,000 children into poverty, Ministers admit
200,000 children will be pushed into poverty as a result of David Cameron and George Osborne’s real terms cuts to tax credits and other working-age benefits, according to official government figures.
In an answer to a parliamentary question, work and pensions minister has Esther McVey admits that the Tory-led Government has estimated that “the uprating measures in 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16 will result in around an extra 200,000 children being deemed by this measure to be in relative income poverty compared to uprating benefits by CPI”.
Ministers are trying to push through the measures with just one day of debate for the committee stage and third reading of the Welfare benefits Uprating Bill in the House of Commons next Monday.
Ed Balls MP, Labour’s shadow chancellor, said:
“The true character of this Conservative-led government has now been exposed. While they give the richest two per cent of earners a £3 billion tax cut, 200,000 children will be pushed into poverty and millions of working families made worse off.
“Ministers have spent weeks refusing to admit what the impact of their policies would be on child poverty and now we know why. Children are paying the price for David Cameron and George Osborne’s economic failure and the political games they have decided to play.
“We need action to kickstart the economy and help people into work with a compulsory jobs guarantee, not this unfair and divisive attack on working families and children.”
Liam Byrne, Labour’s shadow work and pensions secretary, said:
“We already knew the Strivers’ Tax will hit millions of hardworking families but now we know that 200,000 children will pay the price for the mess David Cameron and George Osborne have made of our economy, whilst 8,000 millionaires get a tax cut.
“George Osborne is playing politics with his Strivers’ Tax Bill because he desperately needs a distraction from his own failure. But the Chancellor’s pathetic little games have real consequences for millions of families struggling to make ends meet.
“10 years of Tory Party detoxification has been destroyed because the Chancellor needed a new year dividing line and Britain’s poorest children are paying the price. The nasty party is well and truly back.”
The government argues it is “misleading” to consider the impacts of uprating tax credits and benefits in isolation and claims that it is “investing in tackling the root causes of child poverty through making work pay”. However, changes to tax credits that came into force in April last year mean that thousands of parents in part-time employment are now better off on benefits than in work.
The parliamentary answer also claims that “looking at relative income in isolation is not a helpful measure to track progress towards our target of eradicating child poverty.” But in Opposition, David Cameron, and the current Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith, repeatedly argued that relative poverty was important and that the Conservative Party would measure and act on it.
ENDS
Editor’s notes
1. In a response to a Parliamentary Question published today, DWP Minister Esther McVey admits that “we estimate that the uprating measures in 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16 will result in around an extra 200,000 children being deemed by this measure to be in relative income poverty compared to uprating benefits by CPI”. (Hansard, 15 January 2013, Column 715W-716W, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmhansrd/cm130115/text/130115w0003.htm#13011576000093)
2. The Government has previously admitted that some families with children could be £728 per year better off out of work as a result of losing their working tax credits following new rules which came into force in April 2012. (Hansard, 29 February 2012, Column 395W396W, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201212/cmhansrd/cm120229/text/120229w0004.htm#12022982001826
3. David Cameron and Iain Duncan Smith used to say that relative poverty was important, and that the Conservative Party would measure and act on it.
“I believe that poverty is an economic waste and a moral disgrace. In the past, we used to think of poverty only in absolute terms – meaning straightforward material deprivation. That’s not enough. We need to think of poverty in relative terms – the fact that some people lack those things which others in society take for granted. So I want this message to go out loud and clear: the Conservative Party recognises, will measure and will act on relative poverty.”
David Cameron, Scarman Lecture, 24 November 2006, http://www.conservatives.com/News/Speeches/2006/11/David_Cameron_Tackling_poverty_is_a_social_responsibility.aspx
“So poverty is relative – and those who pretend otherwise are wrong.”
David Cameron, Scarman Lecture, 24 November 2006, http://www.conservatives.com/News/Speeches/2006/11/David_Cameron_Tackling_poverty_is_a_social_responsibility.aspx
“The easiest way I think to define it is that relative poverty is that if some people don’t have what others take for granted and I think it is important not just to say poverty is destitution and there’s a safety net, but as a society grows richer, we want everyone to grow richer and I think relative poverty is important.”
David Cameron, BBC Breakfast, 24 November 2006
“I think the best way to define it is as the figures do, that if you have less than 60% of the average household income you are relatively poor, and I think that is the right measure and I think it’s right to look at relative poverty and that’s what a Conservative government would do. But what I think is really important is what our research has found in doing this policy work is if you look at people with 40% of household income, people who really are in you know, deep poverty, that the amount of people in deep poverty has actually gone up. It’s a staggering fact that in the last 10 years Labour have done…tried so hard and spent so much money on this issue and yet deep poverty in Britain has got worse. There are 750,000 more people with less than 40% of household income and they’re stuck in poverty for just as long and it seems to me that is a really important fact that we have to digest and act on and make sure we reduce poverty in this country.”
David Cameron, BBC Radio 4 Today Programme, 24 November 2006
“In modern times, poverty has been a difficult issue for the Conservative Party to deal with. However, as this Report makes clear, it is too important an issue to be left to the Labour Party. All forms of poverty – absolute and relative – must be dealt with. Unless all parts of society are connected, then we risk social dislocation and exclusion for millions of people.”
Iain Duncan Smith, foreword to Conservative Party Social Justice Policy Group report “Economic Dependency”, December 2006, p. 3, http://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/client/downloads/BB_worklessness.pdf